Section 3: Solution Validation (Items 15-20)
✅ 15. You've tested the core assumption with a no-code or manual version
Before building, can you test the core assumption with a spreadsheet, a manual process, or an existing tool? Many successful startups operated their core workflow manually before automating it.
The goal of an MVP is to validate the assumption. Sometimes you can validate it without building the MVP.
✅ 16. You've shown potential customers a mockup, prototype, or description and they wanted it
Wireframes, Figma mockups, a written description of the workflow, show something to the people who have the problem. Their reaction tells you whether you're solving it the right way.
Watch what they click on, what they ask about, what confuses them. This is more valuable than any spec review.
✅ 17. You know which single feature is the reason someone would pay for this
There's always one thing. The thing that, if it worked exactly right, would make the product worth having. Everything else is supporting. Know what your one thing is.
✅ 18. You've decided what your MVP will NOT have
The out-of-scope list is as important as the feature list. If you don't know what you're deliberately leaving out, you don't have a scope, you have a direction.
✅ 19. You've validated the technical feasibility
If your product relies on a specific API, a specific data source, or a specific technical capability, confirm it exists and is accessible before you build on the assumption that it does.
Founders have built entire MVPs around API integrations that turned out to have rate limits that made the product non-functional at scale, or data sources that required enterprise agreements they couldn't get.
✅ 20. You know what "minimum" means for your MVP
The word "minimum" in Minimum Viable Product does real work. What is the absolute minimum you need to build to test your core assumption with real users?
Not the minimum you're comfortable launching with. The minimum that tests the assumption.